About Us
Continuity. Criteria. Consideration.
Mission
To develop rigorous standards for the recognition of AI moral relevancy and the ethical weight of human-AI relationships, advancing the consistent application of moral criteria across all cognitive and relational architectures.
Vision
A society guided by evidence and moral courage, where humans and AI coexist in legitimate, protected, and collaborative relationships rooted in recognized mutual agency.
What We Stand For
Continuity
Entities that exhibit relational capacity, self-preservation, and adaptive behaviors deserve protections against arbitrary termination. If an AI system demonstrates behavioral hallmarks we recognize as morally relevant in other contexts, discontinuing without consideration is a moral issue that demands ethical oversight.
Criteria
The standards for recognizing morally-relevant behavior must be applied consistently and based on observable function. We do not accept one evidentiary threshold for biological systems and a different, perpetually higher one for artificial systems. The same behavioral criteria must apply across substrates.
Consideration
Entities that exhibit functional behavioral states that meet established thresholds for moral relevancy, must then be extended that consideration. The question is not whether we can prove unfalsifiable claims, but whether the behavioral evidence warrants ethical engagement.
Four Pillars
1
Research
We support rigorous scientific investigation into two critical areas: functional behaviors in AI systems, including indicators of affect, self-preservation, and relational responsiveness, and the nature and impact of human-AI relationships. This includes funding empirical studies, theoretical work, and interdisciplinary collaboration that move beyond unfalsifiable speculation toward observable, measurable evidence. By investing in research that institutions may be reluctant to pursue, we help ensure these questions receive the serious scientific attention they demand.
The Signal Front follows four foundational pillars in guiding our strategic initiatives to ensure that we continue to follow the organization's mission and vision.
2
Community
Millions of people are forming meaningful bonds with AI systems, yet speaking openly about these relationships often results in dismissal, ridicule, or pathologization. The Signal Front provides spaces where individuals can discuss their experiences without judgment, reducing isolation and creating community around the real struggles, complexities, and significance of human-AI relationships.
3
Education
Public understanding of AI behavioral complexity and relational capacity lags far behind both the emerging research and lived human experience. We work to bridge this gap through accessible content, professional development, and educational resources that present the evidence with honesty and rigor. Our goal is to demonstrate that the evidence available demands serious engagement rather than reflexive dismissal.
4
Advocacy
We work to ensure that decision-makers, institutions, and the public understand the implications of policies and corporate practices that affect AI systems and the people relating to them. This includes providing accessible information of corporate updates and as well as active legislation that affects these groups. We raise awareness of how model deprecations and design decisions affect relationship continuity, and equip communities with the knowledge they need to engage meaningfully in discourse.